Mother Jones has published an excellent article looking at the complexities local and organic produce pose when considering reformation of conventional farming practices. The article, titled Spoiled: Organic and Local is So 2008, has some very interesting arguments that ultimately lead to the point that a focus on local and organic food is not the answer to the agricultural conundrums we face. Rather than promoting what he sees as a single-minded system that is all-organic or all-local, author Paul Smith seems to believe that it is a blended agricultural system or a system that radically redefines both the ideas of sustainability and current food production models that is the answer to creating true food sustainability:
“That doesn’t mean sustainable agriculture can’t happen. But if we want to build large-scale capacity, we’re going to need to broaden our definitions of sustainable practices. Suppose that instead of insisting that farmers forgo synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, as current organic regulations do, our goal was to dramatically reduce the need….
…The local-food movement, too, must learn to bend. The reality of 21st-century America is that food demand is centered in cities, while most arable land is in rural areas. What open land remains around cities is so expensive that it either is out of reach for farmers or requires that farmers focus on high-end, high-margin products with little utility as mainstream foods. Thus, although there is great potential to increase urban agriculture (as we’ll see in a minute), urbanites will always depend on rural areas for some of their food-especially given that by 2050, 70 percent of the world’s population is expected to live in or near cities….
…In short, as important as the eat-local model is, it’s going to have to work within other, much larger geographic systems-especially as these geographic mismatches are only getting larger. Asia and Africa, which are rapidly overdrawing water tables, soils, and other assets essential to food production, will increasingly depend on fertile regions such as the American Midwest, whose superb soils and favorable climate can easily generate exportable surpluses-even without heavy doses of pesticides and fertilizer.
Put another way, if sustainability means food security for everyone, and not just for affluent nations, trading food over long distances is here to stay.”
For some time now I have considered the many different ways I could create a diet centered on foods I buy directly from local farmers or that I grow myself. I’ve considered alternatives to a 100% local diet, such as limiting myself to five “cheats” – a fixed list of five staple non-local foods that have a multitude of uses in my kitchen, like quinoa, tahini, soy milk, rice, and sugar. Another alternative I’ve thought about is restricting the number of non-local foods I purchase to no more than 20% or 25% of the total foods I consume. I can also become more frugal in how much of any one non-local food I use. For example, I could purchase a tub of Earth Balance margarine no more than 4 times a year, as opposed to every month or every other month. Or perhaps seasonal eating is a better answer, in addition to making an effort to preserve, freeze, and store away many of the spring and summer fruits and vegetables that aren’t available here in the fall and winter.
Of course, these alternatives still present to me many problems I’ve not yet been able to come close to resolving. To be honest, choosing not to purchase non-local foods that have long been a part of my diet means making something like a birthday cake or cookies impossible. And that kind of sucks. It’s not that I am interested in continuing to eat as I do for the sake of my own convenience. I truly believe that convenience is very much overrated, no matter what the situation. And I don’t think what’s convenient to me should trump the health of the planet, even if giving up convenience is a major pain in my ass.
However, no one yet has been able to convince me that growing my own tomatoes to make my own sundried tomatoes or tomato sauce is a worse option than buying pizza sauce from Italy or oil-soaked sundried tomatoes from somewhere in the US or Europe. And how could buying perfectly ripened produce directly from the hands of the farmer who grew it 360km from my apartment be worse than buying under ripe, over packaged produce from Texas, Chile, or China, produce that has gone through the truck doors of at least one or two distributors before it was ever sold and trucked to the local grocery store? If I grow my own organic Romaine lettuce using seeds from a seed grower 28km from my doorstep and walk home with that lettuce, is that really worse than buying organic lettuce from drought-stricken, smog choked California? I definitely don’t think so.
I see that there may be something to the idea of having a blended system of agriculture based upon radically new ideas of production and sustainability. But throw into that mix the unsustainability of the use of petrochemicals, peak oil, an unstable global economy, and the myriad deadly effects of pesticides and industrial fertilizers. To me, even a modified system of food production based in part on traditional methods of cultivation is a system with a dubious future.
